ES GL EN
← Back to Models

Community of Inquiry

Fundamental theoretical framework for designing deep and meaningful learning experiences.

Garrison, Anderson & Archer (2000)

πŸ“Œ What is the CoI Model?

The Community of Inquiry (CoI) model describes how learning occurs within a community through the interaction of three essential elements. With more than 11,700 citations, it is one of the most influential frameworks in education.

πŸ’‘ Key Concept

Deep learning occurs within a community through the interaction of three essential elements: Cognitive Presence, Social Presence, and Teaching Presence.

Social
Presence
Cognitive
Presence
Teaching
Presence
EDUCATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
RG

D. Randy Garrison

University of Calgary

Principal architect of the model and author of "E-Learning in the 21st Century"

TA

Terry Anderson

Athabasca University

Pioneer in distance education and interaction theory

WA

Walter Archer

University of Alberta

Specialist in qualitative research methodology

Philosophical Basis

πŸŽ“ Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)

  • Father of American pragmatism
  • Concept of "community of inquiry"
  • Truth emerges from community consensus
  • Knowledge is provisional and collaborative

πŸ“š John Dewey (1859-1952)

  • Influential philosopher and educator
  • Practical Inquiry Model
  • Education as reconstruction of experience
  • Learning as a social process
"The essential purpose of education is the development of critical thinking skills and the capacity to be part of a community of inquiry." β€” Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000
🧠

Cognitive Presence

The process of constructing meaning

πŸ“Œ Formal Definition

"The extent to which participants in any particular configuration of a community of inquiry are able to construct meaning through sustained communication." (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2001).

Cognitive Presence is the core element of the model. It is operationalized through the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM).

The Practical Inquiry Cycle

Phase 1

Triggering Event

A problem, dilemma, or question that generates curiosity and initiates the process. Creates a sense of puzzlement that motivates inquiry.

Recognizing the problem Sense of puzzlement Asking questions
Phase 2

Exploration

Participants exchange information, discover ideas, and seek to understand the nature of the problem. It is a divergent phase.

Divergence Information exchange Brainstorming Searching for data
Phase 3

Integration

Focused and structured construction of meaning. Participants connect ideas and create synthesis. It is a convergent phase.

Convergence Synthesis of ideas Connecting concepts Tentative solutions
Phase 4

Resolution

Application of new knowledge to the real world, testing solutions, or generating new questions.

Practical application Testing solutions Defending positions

⚠️ Research Finding

Studies show that without explicit teacher intervention, most discussions remain in the Exploration phase without reaching Integration or Resolution.

Strategies for Each Phase

🎯 Phase 1: Triggering

  • Ask open-ended questions without obvious answers
  • Present real-world cases or scenarios
  • Show contradictions or paradoxes

πŸ” Phase 2: Exploration

  • Facilitate structured brainstorming
  • Provide varied resources
  • Encourage exchange of perspectives

πŸ”— Phase 3: Integration

  • Ask to connect ideas from different sources
  • Request concept maps
  • Guide towards convergence

βœ… Phase 4: Resolution

  • Design practical application projects
  • Ask to defend conclusions
  • Create transferable products
πŸ‘₯

Social Presence

Creating the climate for learning

πŸ“Œ Formal Definition

"The ability of participants to identify with the community (e.g., course of study), communicate purposefully in a trusting environment, and develop inter-personal relationships by way of projecting their individual personalities." (Garrison, 2009).

It is not an end in itself, but a facilitator of cognitive presence. Without trust, there is no deep debate.

1. Affective Expression

Ability and confidence to express emotions, humor, and self-disclosure.

Emoticons Humor Personal stories

2. Open Communication

Reciprocal and respectful exchanges that build trust.

Replying to others Quoting contributions Expressing agreement

3. Group Cohesion

Sense of group commitment and collective identity.

Using "we" Vocatives (names) Collaboration

πŸ“ˆ Temporal Evolution

Affective expression tends to decrease over time while group cohesion increases. As trust grows, there is less need for explicit affective expressions.

"Social presence marks a qualitative difference between a collaborative community of inquiry and a simple process of downloading information." β€” Garrison, Anderson & Archer (2000)
πŸ‘©β€πŸ«

Teaching Presence

Structure and educational leadership

πŸ“Œ Formal Definition

"The design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes." (Anderson et al., 2001).

Teaching Presence is the element that integrates the community. In formal contexts, it is primarily the teacher's responsibility.

Design & Organization

Everything that happens before starting.

  • Setting curriculum and objectives
  • Designing methods and activities
  • Establishing schedule
  • Selecting technology

Facilitating Discourse

During the experience, guiding the discussion.

  • Identifying areas of agreement/disagreement
  • Seeking consensus
  • Encouraging the reticent
  • Maintaining focus

Direct Instruction

Expert contribution and scaffolding.

  • Injecting expert knowledge
  • Diagnosing misunderstandings
  • Summarizing debates
  • Confirming understanding

7 Design Principles (Garrison, 2017)

# Principle Description
1 Open Communication Plan to create trust and open communication
2 Critical Thinking Plan for critical reflection and discourse
3 Teaching Presence Establish instructor presence from the start
4 Positive Community Create and maintain a positive community
5 Resolve Conflicts Identify and resolve areas of confusion
6 Assess Progress Assess learning progress continuously
7 Technical Support Respond to technical needs
🎯

Practical Application

Strategies to implement CoI

The CoI model is a flexible framework adaptable to face-to-face, hybrid, or virtual contexts.

Presence Intersections

Intersection Function Example
Social + Teaching Setting Climate Environment of trust and safety
Cognitive + Teaching Selecting Content Materials that challenge thinking
Social + Cognitive Supporting Discourse Collaboration to construct meaning
All three presences Optimal Experience Deep and meaningful learning

Adaptation for K-12

βœ… What Works

  • Small teams with roles
  • Tangible projects
  • Short inquiry cycles
  • Connection to daily life

⚠️ Adaptations

  • More initial teacher guidance
  • Simplified language
  • Emphasis on visual/manipulative
  • Continuous formative assessment

Digital Tools

Phase Suggested Tools
Triggering Padlet, Mentimeter, Provocative videos
Exploration Forums, Wikis, Miro, Jamboard
Integration Coggle, Canva, Shared Docs
Resolution Genially, Portfolios, Video presentations
πŸ“–

References

Key bibliography of the CoI model

Seminal Articles

Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

πŸ“Š +11,700 citations - Foundational article

Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).

Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing.

Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Journal of Distance Education, 14(2).

Reference Books

E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd ed.).

Garrison, D. R. (2017). New York: Routledge.

🌐 Official Resources

Official site with instruments and papers: coi.athabascau.ca